Teclistamab in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide in multiple myeloma (MajesTEC-2 study)

Introduction: Combination of daratumumab (Dara) and lenalidomide (Len) may enhance the function of teclistamab (Tec), potentially resulting in improved antimyeloma activity in a broader population. We present initial safety and efficacy data of Tec-Dara- Len combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 1b study (MajesTEC-2;NCT04722146). Method(s): Eligible patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and immune-modulatory drug, were given weekly doses of Tec (0.72-or- 1.5 mg/kg with step-up dosing) + Dara 1800 mg + Len 25 mg. Responses per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, adverse events (Aes) per CTCAE v5.0, and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per ASTCT guidelines, were assessed. Result(s): 32 patients received Tec-Dara- Len (0.72 mg/kg, n = 13;1.5 mg/kg, n = 19). At data cut-off (11 July 2022), median follow-up (range) was 5.78 months (1.0-10.4) and median treatment duration was 4.98 months (0.10-10.35). Median age was 62 years (38-75);87.5% were male. Median prior LOT was 2 (1-3), 18.8% were refractory to Dara and 28.1% refractory to Len. CRS was most frequent AE (81.3% [n = 26], all grade 1/2), 95% occurred during cycle1. Median time to onset was 2 days (1-8), median duration was 2 days (1-22). No ICANS were reported. Frequent Aes (>=25.0% across both dose levels) were neutropenia (75.0% [n = 24];grade 3/4: 68.8% [n = 22]), fatigue (43.8% [n = 14];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]), diarrhoea (37.5% [n = 12];all grade 1/2), insomnia (31.3% [n = 10];grade 3/4: 3.1% [n = 1]), cough (28.1% [n = 9];all grade 1/2), hypophosphatemia (25.0% [n = 8];all grade 1/2), and pyrexia (25% [n = 8];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]). Febrile neutropenia frequency was 12.5% (n = 4). Infections occurred in 24 patients (75.0%;grade 3/4: 28.1% [n = 9]). Most common were upper respiratory infection (21.9% [n = 7]), COVID-19 (21.9% [n = 7]), and pneumonia (21.9% [n = 7]). Three (9.4%) had COVID-19 pneumonia. One (3.1%) discontinued due to COVID-19 infection and this patient subsequently died of this infection. Overall response rate (ORR, median follow-up) was 13/13 (8.61 months) at 0.72 mg/kg and 13/16 evaluable patients (less mature at 4.17 months) at 1.5 mg/kg. 12 patients attained very good/better partial response at 0.72 mg/kg dose, and response was not mature for 1.5 mg/kg group. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7-2.0). Preliminary pharmacokinetic concentrations of Tec-Dara- Len were similar as seen with Tec monotherapy. Tec-Dara- Len- treatment led to proinflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. Conclusion(s): The combination of Tec-Dara- Len has no new safety signals beyond those seen with Tec or Dara-Len individually. Promising ORR supports the potential for this combination to have enhanced early disease control through the addition of Tec. These data warrant further investigation.

Oncolytic virus TG6002 safety and activity after intrahepatic artery administration in patients with liverdominant metastatic colorectal cancer

The TG6002.03 trial is a dose-escalation phase 1 clinical trial of TG6002 infusion via the hepatic artery in patients with liver-dominant colorectal cancer metastases. TG6002 is an engineered Copenhagen strain oncolytic Vaccinia virus, deleted of thymidine kinase and ribonucleotide reductase to enhance tumor selective viral replication and expressing FCU1, an enzyme converting the non-cytotoxic prodrug 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) into the chemotherapeutic compound 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this trial, patients with advanced unresectable liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed previous oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy were treated with up to 2 cycles of TG6002 infusion 6 weeks apart via the hepatic artery on day 1 combined with oral 5-FC on days 5 to 14 (where day 1 = TG6002 infusion). TG6002 infusion was performed over 30 minutes via selective catheterization of the hepatic artery proper. 5-FC oral dosing was 50mg/kg x4 daily. Blood was sampled for TG6002 pharmacokinetics and 5-FC and 5-FU measurements. Sampling of liver metastases was performed at screening and on day 4 or day 8 for virus detection and 5-FC and 5-FU quantification. In total, 15 patients (median age 61 years, range 37-78) were treated in 1 UK centre and 2 centres in France and received a dose of TG6002 of 1 x 106 (n=3), 1 x 107 (n=3), 1 x 108 (n=3), or 1 x 109 pfu (n=6). Fourteen of the 15 patients received a single cycle of treatment, including one patient who did not received 5-FC, and one patient received two cycles. TG6002 was transiently detected in plasma following administration, suggesting a strong tissue selectivity for viral replication. In the highest dose cohort, a virus rebound was observed on day 8, concordant with replication time of the virus. In serum samples, 5-FU was present on day 8 in all patients with a high variability ranging from 0.8 to 1072 ng/mL and was measurable over several days after initiation of therapy. Seven of the 9 patients evaluable showed the biodistribution of the virus in liver lesions by PCR testing on day 4 or day 8. Translational blood samples showed evidence for T-cell activation and immune checkpoint receptor-ligand expression. At 1 x 109 pfu, there was evidence for T-cell proliferation and activation against tumour-associated antigens by ELISpot and for immunogenic cell death. In terms of safety, a total of 34 TG6002-related adverse events were reported, of which 32 were grade 1-2 and 2 were grade 3. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and a single dose-limiting toxicity was observed consisting of a myocardial infarction in a context of recent Covid-19 infection in a 78-year-old patient. These results indicate that TG6002 infused via the hepatic artery in combination with oral 5-FC was well tolerated, effectively localized and replicated in the tumor tissues, expressed its therapeutic payload and showed anti-tumoral immunological activity.

Bioequivalence study of generic nirmatrelvir in healthy volunteers

Nirmatrelvir is an antiviral drug that, in combination with ritonavir, is an effective agent for the etiotropic therapy of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. The aim of the study was to evaluate bioequivalence of the generic drug nirmatrelvir Arpaxel in combination with ritonavir and the original drug Paxlovid, which is a combination of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, in a single dose administration to healthy volunteers.Materials and methods. This research was an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover bioequivalence study. It included 2 periods, in each of which the volunteers received either a test drug (nirmatrelvir at the dose of 300 mg) in combination with ritonavir (100 mg), or a reference drug (a combination of nirmatrelvir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg), given as a single dose. A wash-out period between each of the administrations was 7 days. The blood sampling to determine the concentration of nirmatrelvir was carried out in the range from 0 to 36 h in each of the study periods. A nirmatrelvir concentration was determined by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method with a lower quantitation limit of 10 ng/mL. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of AUC(0-36) and Cmax of the test drug and reference drugs with the established equivalence limits of 80.00-125.00%.Results. In the study were included 68 healthy volunteers, 67 participants of which were included in the bioequivalence population. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were comparable to each other. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the geometric mean of the maximum drug concentration in the blood plasma and the area under the pharmacokinetic curve << concentration-time >> from zero to the last blood draw within 36 hours of nirmatrelvir was 87.26-100.83 and 93.27-103.74%, which meets the criteria for assessing bioequivalence. The test drugs were well tolerated by the volunteers. The incidence of adverse events was similar for the test and reference drugs. No serious adverse events were recorded during the entire study.Conclusion. As a result of this study, bioequivalence of the test and reference drugs has been established.

Allergic reactions of COVID-19 vaccine based on mRNA-LNP and its pharmacokinetics in vivo.

Vaccination has been proved to be the most effective strategy to prevent the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The mRNA vaccine based on nano drug delivery system (NDDS) - lipid nanoparticles (LNP) has been widely used because of its high effectiveness and safety. Although there have been reports of severe allergic reactions caused by mRNA-LNP vaccines, the mechanism and components of anaphylaxis have not been completely clarified yet. This review focuses on two mRNA-LNP vaccines, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. After summarizing the structural characteristics, potential allergens, possible allergic reaction mechanism, and pharmacokinetics of mRNA and LNP in vivo, this article then reviews the evaluation methods for patients with allergic history, as well as the regulations of different countries and regions on people who should not be vaccinated, in order to promote more safe injection of vaccines. LNP has become a recognized highly customizable nucleic acid delivery vector, which not only shows its value in mRNA vaccines, but also has great potential in treating rare diseases, cancers and other broad fields in the future. At the moment when mRNA-LNP vaccines open a new era of nano medicine, it is expected to provide some inspiration for safety research in the process of research, development and evaluation of more nano delivery drugs, and promote more nano drugs successfully to market.Copyright © 2023, Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. All rights reserved.

Perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: new insight

Cumulative data regardingCOVID-19 infection during pregnancy have demonstrated the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect the placenta. However, the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 placental viral entry are yet to be defined. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells by binding to the ACE2 receptor. However, SARS-CoV-2 cell entry also requires co-localization of spike protein cleavage by the serine protease TMPRSS2. However, the co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in placental cells is debated, raising the question of whether potential non-canonical molecular mechanismsmay be involved in SARS-CoV-2 placental cells' viral entry. Although published data regarding the ability of the SARS-CoV- 2 to infect the fetus are contradicting, the placenta appears to be an immunological barrier to active SARS-CoV-2 infection and vertical transmission;however, the mechanism is unclear. Our experiments demonstrated the ability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to directly infect the placenta and induce transcriptomic responses in COVID-positive mothers. These transcriptomic responses were characterized by differential expression of specific mRNAs and miRNAs associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, with induction of specific placental miRNAs that can inhibit viral replication. Failure in such mechanisms may be associated with vertical transmission. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have been widely used to reduce the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Historically, non-live vaccines have not caused any harm to pregnant mothers;however, it is unclear whether our current understanding of the effects of non-live vaccines serves as a reliable precedent owing to the novel technology used to create these mRNA vaccines. Since there are no definitive data on the possible biodistribution of mRNA vaccines to the placenta, the likelihood of vaccine mRNA reaching the fetus remains uncertain. Little has been reported on the tissue localization of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) after intramuscular (IM) administration of the mRNA vaccine. The biodistribution of LNPs containing the mRNA vaccine has been investigated in animal models but not humans. In the murine model, the vaccine LNPs were rapidly disseminated to several organs, including the heart, liver, kidney, lung, and spleen, following IM administration. However, no traditional pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been performed with the mRNA vaccines, including possible biodistribution to breast milk or the placenta.

Nanomedicine "New Food for an Old Mouth": Novel Approaches for the Treatment of COVID-19

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by coronavirus. Devel-oping specific drugs for inhibiting replication and viral entry is crucial. Several clinical trial studies are underway to evaluate the efficacy of anti-viral drugs for COVID-19 patients. Nanomedicine formulations can present a novel strategy for targeting the virus life cycle. Nano-drug delivery systems can modify the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties of anti-viral drugs and reduce their adverse effects. Moreover, nanocarriers can directly exhibit anti-viral effects. A number of nanocarriers have been studied for this purpose, including liposomes, dendrimers, exosomes and decoy nanoparticles (NPs). Among them, decoy NPs have been considered more as nanodecoys can efficiently protect host cells from the infection of SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this review article is to highlight the probable nanomedicine therapeutic strategies to develop anti-viral drug delivery systems for the treatment of COVID-19.Copyright © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.

QSAR and DFT Studies of Some Tacrine-Hydroxamate Derivatives as Inhibitors of Cholinesterase (AChEs) in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Introduction: This work was devoted to an in silico investigation conducted on twenty-eight Tacrine-hydroxamate derivatives as a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease using DFT and QSAR modeling techniques. Method(s): The data set was randomly partitioned into a training set (22 compounds) and a test set (6 compounds). Then, fourteen models were built and were used to compute the predicted pIC50 of compounds belonging to the test set. Result(s): Al built models were individualy validated using both internal and external validation methods, including the Y-Randomization test and Golbraikh and Tropsha's model acceptance criteria. Then, one model was selected for its higher R2, R2test, and Q2cv values (R2 = 0.768, R2adj = 0.713, MSE = 0.304, R2test=0.973, Q2cv = 0.615). From these outcomes, the activity of the studied compounds toward the main protease of Cholinesterase (AChEs) seems to be influenced by 4 descriptors, i.e., the total dipole moment of the molecule (mu), number of rotatable bonds (RB), molecular topology radius (MTR) and molecular topology polar surface area (MTPSA). The effect of these descriptors on the activity was studied, in particular, the increase in the total dipole moment and the topological radius of the molecule and the reduction of the rotatable bond and topology polar surface area increase the activity. Conclusion(s): Some newly designed compounds with higher AChEs inhibitory activity have been designed based on the best-proposed QSAR model. In addition, ADMET pharmacokinetic properties were carried out for the proposed compounds, the toxicity results indicate that 7 molecules are nontoxic.Copyright © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.

Amorphous Solid Dispersion of Niclosamide with Water-Soluble β-Cyclodextrins for Dissolution and Bioavailability Enhancement

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are cyclic oligosaccharides widely employed for the solubility enhancement of poorly water-soluble drugs. Niclosamide is a BCS class II drug for tapeworm infections and is currently under repurposing for various other indications, including COVID-19. Due to its low aqueous solubility, a high daily dose (2 g) is required for clinical efficacy. Herein, we investigate the potential of beta-cyclodextrin (β-CD) and its sulfobutylether and hydroxypropyl derivatives for the dissolution enhancement of niclosamide. The solid dispersions were prepared by kneading the drug and cyclodextrins together by adding solvent, water: methanol (1 : 1 v/v). Among various CDs studied, 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) in the 1: 2 molar ratio (SB-IC-N4 batch) shows the most significant improvement in water solubility of niclosamide (6.3 vs. 182 μg/ml), resulting in 2-fold improved in-vitro dissolution. The comparative oral pharmacokinetics in Wistar rats at 50 mg/kg produced 1.69-fold higher plasma exposure of niclosamide. The spectral characterization provided molecular insights into interactions of niclosamide with HP-β-CD. These results suggest that the dispersion of niclosamide with HP-β-CD aid in faster dissolution and better drug bioavailability. © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Dried blood spot (DBS) sample analysis for drug and metabolomic profiling in oncology clinical trials: Cost-effective decentralized sampling modality for precision Oncology

The COVID19 pandemic accelerated opportunities for innovation within the decentralization process of clinical trials with opportunities for implementation of patient-centric workflows for efficiency and cost-reduction. Decentralized sample collection, particularly whole blood using dried blood spots (DBS) provides the ideal mechanism for patient driven sample collection with ease of access to sample generation, drug level assessments and metabolomic prMegofiling, providing longitudinal real-time measure of drug specific pharmacodynamic readout for safety and efficacy. In this study, we report the development of a protocol for the capture and comprehensive profiling of metabolomics using dried blood spots from a cohort of 49 healthy volunteer donors. Using liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometric (UPLC-MS/MS) methods an untargeted metabolomic approach resulted in the identification of >800 biochemicals of which a significant subset was found to be presented in corresponding matched plasma (from whole blood) samples. The biochemicals identified from the DBS samples included metabolites that were part of the lipid, amino acid, nucleotide, peptide, cofactors, carbohydrate and energy super pathways. A significant number of metabolites identified in the DBS samples were xenobiotics including those representing the biotransformation products of drugs. The overall metabolite profiles were analyzed for precision and accuracy of measure, variability in performance and dynamic range to establish benchmarks for evaluation. An additional cohort with a longitudinal sampling as part of the protocol provided the reproducibility of the analytic method for inter-day variability of metabolite performance over time. Although metabolomic profiles varied between individuals from a population perspective, there was minimal variation observed within individuals when samples were profiled longitudinally over several weeks. Thus, the protocols for DBS collection and the corresponding capture of a large set of metabolites with reproducible performance provides an opportunity for its implementation in oncological clinical trials as part of a de-centralized clinical trial solution.

SAFETY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF IGPRO20 (SUBCUTANEOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN) AND IGPRO10 (INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN) IN ADULTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (SSC) – RESULTS FROM A PHASE 2 TRIAL

BackgroundSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe, progressive multisystem rheumatic disease with high mortality, but without approved disease-modifying treatment to stop or reverse course of disease. Intravenous immunoglobulin G (IgG) may have a positive impact on SSc based upon available literature reports. However, to date, there have been no clinical trials evaluating subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) in SSc. In particular, the impact of pathologically altered skin in SSc on local safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SCIG has not been explored yet.ObjectivesThe primary and secondary objectives of this trial (NCT04137224) included safety, including local infusion safety, and bioavailability of subcutaneous IgG (IgPro20) in adults with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc).MethodsThis was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Adult subjects with dcSSc diagnosis within 5 years from first non-Raynaud's phenomenon and modified Rodnan Skin Score of 15-45 at screening were randomized 1:1 to sequence A (IgPro20, 20% normal human subcutaneous immunoglobulin followed by IgPro10, 10% normal human intravenous immunoglobulin) or sequence B (IgPro10 followed by IgPro20). Each subject was to complete two treatment periods (16 weeks each), with up to 40 weeks (including screening) study duration for an individual subject. Doses received were 0.5g/kg/week split over two sessions for IgPro20, and 2g/kg/4 weeks split over 2-5 days for IgPro10. The primary endpoint was safety of IgPro20, described as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and changes in clinical observations.Results27 subjects were randomized, with 13 subjects to sequence A and 14 subjects to sequence B. In total, 25 subjects completed the study. Of 27 treated subjects, 107 TEAEs occurred in 22 subjects (81.5%) over the 36-week study period, the majority of which were mild or moderate. The most common TEAEs (>10% of subjects) by preferred term (PT) were headache (12 events occurring in 6 subjects [22.2%]), COVID-19 (3 events occurring in 3 subjects [11.1%]), diarrhoea (3 events occurring in 3 subjects [11.1%]), and vomiting (3 events occurring in 3 subjects [11.1%]).A total of 10 serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 6 subjects (Viral infection, Chronic gastritis, Vomiting, Dehydration, Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, Chest pain, Myocardial infarction, Myocardial ischemia, Breast cancer, Interstitial lung disease). Among these, one subject experienced 2 SAEs (myocardial ischemia & myocardial infarction) and was discontinued from study treatment. None of the SAEs were considered related to study treatment by the investigator, and no deaths were reported.For IgPro20, 14 infusion site reactions (ISRs) occurred in 5 subjects (19.2%), all were mild or moderate in severity. The most common ISRs were infusion site pain and infusion site swelling (3 events in 2 subjects each, 7.7%). In total, 686 IgPro20 infusions were performed, resulting in an overall ISR rate per infusion of 0.02, ie 2 ISRs per 100 infusions. No ISRs were reported for IgPro10.No clinically relevant trends in vital signs, body weight, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, or pulmonary function tests were observed.PK profiles and bioavailability in dcSSc subjects were similar to those observed in other approved indications such as Primary Immunodeficiency. Population relative bioavailability of IgPro20, based on dose-normalized, baseline-corrected AUC0-tau was 0.761 (90% CI: 0.7033, 0.8232), ie 76.1% compared to IgPro10 (intravenous IgG).ConclusionThe overall safety profiles of IgPro20 and IgPro10 in subjects with dcSSc were consistent with that in approved indications such as CIDP, including a relatively low ISR rate for IgPro20. PK profiles and bioavailability were also similar to other indications. This study indicates that subcutaneous administration of IgPro20 has acceptable safety, bioavailability and PK profiles in patients with dcSSc. AcknowledgementsEditorial assistance was provided by Meridian HealthComms Ltd., funded by CSL Behring.Disclosure of InterestsChristopher P Denton Speakers bureau: Ja ssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: GSK, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: GSK, CSL Behring, Inventiva, Horizon, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, Grant/research support from: Received congress support from Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Medac, Susanna Proudman Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Marzena Olesińska Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Margitta Worm Consultant of: Novartis Pharma GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, DBV Technologies S.A, Aimmune Therapeutics UK Limited, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Leo Pharma GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH &Co.KG, ALK-Abelló Arzneimittel GmbH, Kymab Limited, Amgen GmbH, Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Mylan Germany GmbH (A Viatris Company), AstraZeneca GmbH, Lilly Deutschland GmbH and GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG., Nicoletta Del Papa Speakers bureau: Janssen Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim., Marco Matucci-Cerinic Speakers bureau: Biogen, Sandoz, Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: MSD, Chemomab, Jana Radewonuk Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Jeanine Jochems Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Amgad Shebl Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Anna Krupa Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Jutta Hofmann Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Maria Gasior Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring.

Preliminary safety of Bcl-2 inhibitor BGB-11417 in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma Harbouring t(11,14): Phase 1b/2 study

Background: B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) proteins play an important role in multiple myeloma (MM) cell survival and represent an attractive therapeutic target. In prior trials, a subgroup analysis of patients with t(11;14)-positive relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM showed the combination of a Bcl-2 inhibitor, a proteasome inhibitor, and dexamethasone improved progression-free survival with no increased mortality. BGB-11417, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, is more potent and selective than venetoclax. BGB-11417- 105 (NCT04973605) is a phase 1b/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of BGB-11417 monotherapy, in combination with dexamethasone, or with dexamethasone+carfilzomib in patients with t(11;14)-positive R/R MM. Preliminary safety results for the combination of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone are presented. Method(s): Eligible patients had t(11;14)-positive R/R MM and had been exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory agent, and anti-CD38 therapy. Patients received 80-, 160-, 320-, or 640-mg BGB-11417 daily with 40-mg dexamethasone weekly until death, intolerability, or disease progression. Dose escalation was guided by a mTPI-2 design and overall review by a safety monitoring committee. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were also assessed. Result(s): As of 1 July 2022, 10 patients were enrolled in the 80-, 160-, and 320-mg (3 patients each) and 640-mg (1 patient) dose-escalation cohorts of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone. The median age was 69 years (range, 52-81) and median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1-5). The median treatment duration was 3.2 months (range, 0.5-6.5). No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level. Three patients died whilst on study: 1 due to COVID-19 complications 157 days after treatment discontinuation (day 208), 1 due to progressive disease 50 days after treatment discontinuation (day 89), and 1 due to COVID-19 whilst on study treatment (day 78). No deaths were associated with study treatment. Two patients experienced Grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). One patient in the 160-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 increase in liver enzymes and lymphopenia. One patient in the 320-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 lymphopenia. The most common TEAEs were insomnia (50%), fatigue (30%), arthralgia (20%), back pain (20%), lymphopenia (20%), and nausea (20%). BGB-11417 exposure increased dose-dependently from 80 mg to 320 mg with high interpatient PK variability. BGB-11417 exposures after single and multiple doses appeared similar, indicating limited accumulation. Conclusion(s): BGB-11417 plus dexamethasone was generally well-tolerated in patients with R/R MM harbouring t(11;14) at doses <=640 mg. Efficacy data are forthcoming. Recruitment is ongoing in the US, Australia, and New Zealand;the BGB-11417, dexamethasone, and carfilzomib combination arm will open in the future.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of drug-drug interactions in the treatment of COVID-19.

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic, which started in Wuhan, China and affected the whole world, still represents a unique global challenge with its contagiousness and lethality. The symptoms of COVID-19 patients may differ depending on the severity of the disease. According to the report published by the Ministry of Health Coronavirus Research Advisory Board on the diagnosis, treatment and control of COVID-19, drug combination therapy (hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir / ritonavir and favipiravir) is recommended by health authorities. Drug-drug interaction is a possible situation as a result of simultaneous use of these drugs, which are metabolized by cytochrome P 450 enzymes (CYP), which are mostly found in the liver, with some other drugs. In this review, we aimed to show the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of the drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19, especially by indicating the metabolism pathways. Result and Discussion: The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects social life, economic and financial markets worldwide. Appropriate treatment protocols are of great importance but taking drug-drug interactions into account in treatment practices prevents unwanted results in patient treatment.Copyright © 2021 University of Ankara. All rights reserved.

Dose-Dependent Production of Anti-PEG IgM after Intramuscular PEGylated-Hydrogenated Soy Phosphatidylcholine Liposomes, but Not Lipid Nanoparticle Formulations of DNA, Correlates with the Plasma Clearance of PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Rats.

PEGylated lipid nanoparticle-based Covid-19 vaccines, including Pfizer's BNT162b2 and Moderna's mRNA-1273, have been shown to stimulate variable anti-PEG antibody production in humans. Anti-PEG antibodies have the potential to accelerate the plasma clearance of PEGylated therapeutics, such as PEGylated liposomes and proteins, and compromise their therapeutic efficacy. However, it is not yet clear whether antibody titers produced by PEGylated Covid-19 vaccines significantly affect the clearance of PEGylated therapeutics. This study examined how anti-PEG IgM levels affect the pharmacokinetics of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and compared the immunogenicity of a lipid nanoparticle formulation of linear DNA (DNA-LNP) to standard PEG-HSPC liposomes. DNA-LNP was prepared using the same composition and approach as Pfizer's BNT162b2, except linear double-stranded DNA was used as the genetic material. PEGylated HSPC-based liposomes were formulated using the lipid rehydration and extrusion method. Nanoparticles were dosed IM to rats at 0.005-0.5 mg lipid/kg body weight 1 week before evaluating the plasma pharmacokinetics of clinically relevant doses of PLD (1 mg/kg, IV) or PEGylated interferon α2a (Pegasys, 5 µg/kg, SC). Plasma PEG IgM was compared between pre- and 1-week post-dose blood samples. The results showed that anti-PEG IgM production increased with increasing PEG-HSPC liposome dose and that IgM significantly correlated with the plasma half-life, clearance, volume of distribution, and area under the curve of a subsequent dose of PLD. The plasma exposure of Pegasys was also significantly reduced after initial delivery of 0.005 mg/ml PEG-HSPC liposome. However, a single 0.05 mg/kg IM dose of DNA-LNP did not significantly elevate PEG IgM and did not alter the IV pharmacokinetics of PLD. These data showed that PEGylated Covid-19 vaccines are less immunogenic compared to standard PEGylated HSPC liposomes and that there is an antibody threshold for accelerating the clearance of PEGylated therapeutics.

Simultaneous Determination of Ten Active Components From Jinhongtang Granule in Rat Plasma by LC-MS/MS and its Application to a Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study in Normal and Sepsis Rats In Vivo and In Vitro.

Jinhongtang granule (JHT) is a traditional Chinese medicine formula used for treatment of infection diseases including severe COVID-19. However, pharmacokinetics of JHT was unknown, especially in infection condition. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed to simultaneously quantify ten active components form JHT in rat plasma. MS detection was performed by MRM scanning operating in the negative ionization mode. The method showed good linearity (r > 0.997). The accuracy, precision, matrix effect, recovery and stability were all satisfactory with current criterion. The method was successfully applied to compare the pharmacokinetic difference between normal and sepsis rats. The pharmacokinetic behaviors of analytes in sepsis rats were significantly different from those in normal rats. Cmax and AUC of rhein, emodin, aloe emodin, rhein-8-glucoside, aloe emodin 8-glucoside, protocatechuic acid, epicatechin and salidroside, were significantly increased in sepsis rats, except for 4-hydroxycinnamic acid and ferulic acid. In vitro intestinal absorption study using everted intestinal sac preparations indicated that the intestinal permeability was altered under sepsis. In conclusion, pharmacokinetic difference of JHT between normal and sepsis rats were evaluated for the first time, which provided useful information for the clinical application of JHT as an integrative therapy for severe and critical COVID-19.

A clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between dextromethorphan and emvododstat, a potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor.

PURPOSE: A therapeutic agent that targets both viral replication and the hyper-reactive immune response would offer a highly desirable treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) management. Emvododstat (PTC299; 4-chlorophenyl 6-chloro-1-[4-methoxyphenyl]-1,3, 4,9-tetrahydro-2H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole-2-carboxylate) was found to be a potent inhibitor of immunomodulatory and inflammation-related processes by inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase to reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections This drug interaction study was performed to determine if emvododstat was an inhibitor of CYP2D6. METHODS: Potential drug-drug interactions between emvododstat and a CYP2D6 probe substrate (dextromethorphan) were investigated by measuring plasma dextromethorphan and metabolite (dextrorphan) concentrations before and after emvododstat administration. On day 1, 18 healthy subjects received an oral dose of 30 mg dextromethorphan followed by a 4-day washout period. On day 5, subjects received an oral dose of 250 mg emvododstat with food. Two hours later, 30 mg dextromethorphan was administered. RESULTS: When given with emvododstat, plasma dextromethorphan concentrations increased substantially, while metabolite levels (dextrorphan) remained essentially the same. Maximum plasma dextromethorphan concentration (Cmax) increased from 2006 to 5847 pg/mL. Dextromethorphan exposure (AUC) increased from 18,829 to 157,400 h·pg/mL for AUC0-last and from 21,585 to 362,107 h·pg/mL for AUC0-inf following administration of emvododstat. When dextromethorphan parameters were compared before and after emvododstat, least squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) were found to be 2.9 (2.2, 3.8), 8.4 (6.1, 11.5), and 14.9 (10.0, 22.1) for Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUC0-inf, respectively. CONCLUSION: Emvododstat appears to be a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor. No drug-related treatment emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were considered to be severe or serious. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2021-004626-29, 11 May 2021.

Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for hemodialysis patients with COVID-19.

Background: Hemodialysis patients have a high risk of severe/critical COVID-19 and related high mortality, but nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is not recommended for hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 infection because of lack of evidence of safety. Objectives: Our study aims to evaluate the minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of nirmatrelvir and its safety of different doses of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in hemodialysis patients with mild COVID-19. Method: This was a prospective, two step, nonrandomized, open-label study. Participants were treated with nirmatrelvir 150 mg or 300 mg once a day (another 75 mg or 150 mg supplied after hemodialysis) and ritonavir 100 mg twice daily for 5 days, respectively. The primary outcome was the safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, including the Cmin of nirmatrelvir and the number of adverse events (AE). The secondary outcome was the time of viral elimination in hemodialysis patients. Results: Adverse events were happened in 3 and 7 participants in the step 1 and step 2 group, respectively (p = 0.025). Among them, 2 and 6 participants were identified as drug-related adverse events (p = 0.054). No SAE or liver function damage happened. The Cmin of nirmatrelvir in step 1 and step 2 group were 5,294.65 ± 2,370.59 ng/mL and 7,675.67 ± 2,745.22 ng/mL (p = 0.125). The Cmin of the control group was 2,274.10 ± 1,347.25 ng/mL (p = 0.001 compared to step 2 and p = 0.059 compared to step 1). Compared to hemodialysis patients without nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, there were no statistical differences in overall viral elimination time (p = 0.232). Conclusion: In our study, two doses of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir appeared to be excessive for hemodialysis patients. Although all of the patients tolerated 5-day administration, nearly half of the patients experienced drug-related adverse events. In addition, the medication group did not show a significant advantage in the time of viral elimination.

Sustaining Life versus Altering Life-Saving Drugs: Insights to Explain the Paradoxical Effect of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Drugs.

There has been a substantial increase in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in critically ill adults. Understanding the complex changes that could affect drugs' pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) is of suitable need. Therefore, critically ill patients on ECMO represent a challenging clinical situation to manage pharmacotherapy. Thus, clinicians' ability to predict PK and PD alterations within this complex clinical context is fundamental to ensure further optimal and, sometimes, individualized therapeutic plans that balance clinical outcomes with the minimum drug adverse events. Although ECMO remains an irreplaceable extracorporeal technology, and despite the resurgence in its use for respiratory and cardiac failures, especially in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, scarce data exist on both its effect on the most commonly used drugs and their relative management to achieve the best therapeutic outcomes. The goal of this review is to provide key information about some evidence-based PK alterations of the drugs used in an ECMO setting and their monitoring.

Simulation of optimal dose regimens of photoactivated curcumin for antimicrobial resistance pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: A modeling approach.

Background: Secondary antimicrobial resistance bacterial (AMR) pneumonia could lead to an increase in mortality in COVID-19 patients, particularly of geriatric patients with underlying diseases. The comedication of current medicines for AMR pneumonia with corticosteroids may lead to suboptimal treatment or toxicities due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Objective: This study aimed to propose new promising dosage regimens of photoactivated curcumin when co-administered with corticosteroids for the treatment of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pneumonia in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) with the simplified lung compartments model was built and verified following standard model verification (absolute average-folding error or AAFEs). The pharmacokinetic properties of photoactivated were assumed to be similar to curcumin due to minor changes in physiochemical properties of compound by photoactivation. The acceptable AAFEs values were within 2-fold. The verified model was used to simulate new regimens for different formulations of photoactivated curcumin. Results: The AAFEs was 1.12-fold. Original formulation (120 mg once-daily dose) or new intramuscular nano-formulation (100 mg with a release rate of 10/h given every 7 days) is suitable for outpatients with MRSA pneumonia to improve patient adherence. New intravenous formulation (2000 mg twice-daily doses) is for hospitalized patients with both MRSA and VRSA pneumonia. Conclusion: The PBPK models, in conjunction with MIC and applied physiological changes in COVID-19 patients, is a potential tool to predict optimal dosage regimens of photoactivated curcumin for the treatment of co-infected AMR pneumonia in COVID-19 patients. Each formulation is appropriate for different patient conditions and pathogens.

Potential herb‒drug interactions between anti-COVID-19 drugs and traditional Chinese medicine.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread worldwide. Effective treatments against COVID-19 remain urgently in need although vaccination significantly reduces the incidence, hospitalization, and mortality. At present, antiviral drugs including Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (PaxlovidTM), Remdesivir, and Molnupiravir have been authorized to treat COVID-19 and become more globally available. On the other hand, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used for the treatment of epidemic diseases for a long history. Currently, various TCM formulae against COVID-19 such as Qingfei Paidu decoction, Xuanfei Baidu granule, Huashi Baidu granule, Jinhua Qinggan granule, Lianhua Qingwen capsule, and Xuebijing injection have been widely used in clinical practice in China, which may cause potential herb-drug interactions (HDIs) in patients under treatment with antiviral drugs and affect the efficacy and safety of medicines. However, information on potential HDIs between the above anti-COVID-19 drugs and TCM formulae is lacking, and thus this work seeks to summarize and highlight potential HDIs between antiviral drugs and TCM formulae against COVID-19, and especially pharmacokinetic HDIs mediated by metabolizing enzymes and/or transporters. These well-characterized HDIs could provide useful information on clinical concomitant medicine use to maximize clinical outcomes and minimize adverse and toxic effects.